StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

English and Literacy in Primary School - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "English and Literacy in Primary School" focuses on the different discourses of writing that have been clearly distinguished and their relevance in the specific sections of the curriculum analyzed. The skills discourse of writing is the basic approach considered when teaching writing. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "English and Literacy in Primary School"

English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing (Student’s Name) (Institution) (Course) (Instructor) (Date) English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Introduction Discourses of writing are a collection of principles regarding writing, learning about writing and the strategies of teaching and evaluation that are rooted to these principles (Gee, 2003). People who are identified with the specific teaching methods have a common approach to teaching, speaking and writing and they do so in ways that attach them to the same discourse. However, the occurrences of such discourses do not conform to a consistent pattern as human influence progressively morphs the existing discourse related characteristics to suit their individual usage requirements (Gannon, 2007). As a result, the practical deployment of the discourse often draws from multiple distinct discourses as opposed to sourcing from a harmonized instance. This essay is going to describe the six discourses and analyse their presence or absence in the curriculum, outlining the reasons for each. Analysis and Discussion The proper application of knowledge related to the construction of sentences following basic rules of linguistics and application of pattern and symbol recognition make up the practice of writing (Christie, 2005). This description on its own is misleading in that it creates the perception that writing is principally independent of context and the same universal procedures apply regardless of the text nature. Based on this understanding, the accuracy of writing is gauged against the backdrop of letter, word, and sentence and text construction, context notwithstanding (Ivanic, 2004). A more radical interpretation of this description implies that writing is merely a collection of symbols that can be combined to develop a cohesive set of text and structures to develop paragraphs. The modern times have however brought about the appreciation of text dissimilarities in terms of the patterns and symbol arrangements (Ivanic, 2004). The skills discourse is present across all stages of the NSW Board of Studies English K-10 syllabus. Most notably in the Early Stage 1 as demonstrated by the objectives of the teaching at this particular stage as seen in outcome ENe-5B where the student “recognises some different purposes of writing and that their own texts differ in various ways” Emphasis is placed on appreciating the difference types of writing and that individual texts are dissimilar in a number of ways. According to Ivanic (2004), most curricula build on the perception that learning to write entails the need to acquire linguistic skills. This concept leads to teaching approaches that focus on the appropriateness of handwriting, spelling and sentence structure. The Early stage one of the English K-10 syllabus explicitly outlines the need for learners to identify the place and function of capital letters, full stops, question marks and exclamation marks. To further cement the importance of the skills discourse, its appearance in Stage 3, outcome EN3-4B where the learner is advised to understand how ideas can be expanded and sharpened through carefull choice of verbs, elaborate tenses and a range of adverb gropus or phrases demonstartes its relation to the creativity discourse of writing (Dixon, 1967). The dominance of this particular discourse in the Early Stage 1 of the curriculum is attributed to the importance of acquisition of the skill is before delving into the other discourses of writing (Winch, 2010). The creativity discourse of writing places more emphasis on the writer’s content and style as opposed to its grammatical presentation. Outcome EN1-5B of the NWS Board of Studies English K-10 syllabus dictates that the student identifies how language use in their own writing differs according to purpose, audience and subject matter. As part of the learning the student is able to identify the audience of informative, imaginative and persuasive texts. Ivanic, (2004) asserts that writing is regarded as the creative presentation of writer whose principal purpose is entertaining the reader. As a consequence the writer is more driven by the desire to capture the reader’s attention and sustain their interest in the work. The writing is thus classified as being good based on the nature of the content presented as well as the style of writing with minimal concerns for the linguistic correctness (Cope, 2000). These views on creativity support the idea of writing being learnt through practice and experience. A higher frequency of writing naturally prompts the writer to explore a greater variety of topics that generate interest and offer inspiration in appreciable quantities (Ivanic, 2004). Not only is the relevance of the content guaranteed, the material offers the motivation for other learners to improve their writing. The creativity discourse of writing is dominant in the curriculum across stages 1 to 3, learning outcome EN1-5B especially so as to place the learners in a position to create material that is relevant to specific topics while maintaining a commendable length of writing (Ivanic, 2004). Most of the writing achieved by these methods is generally personal narratives, learner’s descriptions about their experiences and coverage of topics within the learner’s scope of familiarity. The next logical step after acquisition of the basic skills is their application in the writing of captivating texts (Ivanic, 2004). The objectives of the stage demonstrate the presence of this particular discourse in that they recommend that the learner be able to identify how their language use in writing differs according to purpose, audience and content (Knapp, 2005). As a benefit from this outlook the learners are able to present imaginative and creative texts that capture the audience’s attention (Ivanic, 2004). Writing involves three distinct processes which include planning, translating and reviewing. These three make up the process discourse of writing and are majorly concerned with the writer’s memory and the writing experiences (Clark, Consciousness-raising about the writing process, 1991). Methods of teaching writing have been focussed on the processes of planning, drafting and translating while effectively ignoring the contents of the final product (Ivanic, 2004). In addition to this, learning to write is viewed as an undertaking that requires the need to grasp the processes that pertain to developing and constructing texts. These processes contain elements that must be learnt directly in relation to a given writing context as well as elements that apply irrespective of the nature of the writing (Flower, 1980). The process discourse of writing is tackled in stage 3 of the curriculum alongside the creative discourse of writing. Learning outcome EN3-3B of the English K-10 syllabus dictates that the student discusses how language is used in their own writing to achieve a wide range of purposes, audiences and context. The curriculum recommends that the learners be able to discuss how their texts have been structured to achieve their purpose. References to the creative discourse are made in the requirement that learners develop ways to imaginatively compose texts in ways that will appeal to the audience (Ivanic, 2004). The fourth discourse of writing is based on the nature of writing as an end result; however it adds the additional aspect of the prevailing factors and events surrounding the writing. The genre discourse writing takes into consideration the various social contexts that serve to build the text and the text variation in accordance to the purpose of the writing (Ivanic, 2004). In light of this, the type of writing requires the learners to familiarise themselves with different linguistic attributes in order to accurately integrate them in the appropriate (Ivanic, 2004). This condition dictates that the learner pursue the understanding of related linguistics. From the acquired knowledge, the learner is in a position to cater to the demands of varied contexts (Anstey, 2004). Learning genres is has been theorised as a fundamental principal in the learning of the primary language (Knapp, 2005).It builds and improves the ability to conceptualize the structure of communication and as a consequence promote the functional linguistic development (Knapp, 2005). Language learning is principally through interaction with natives within the limits of common experiences. Teaching methods are in such cases centred on imparting genres that are relevant in the given setting. With the progress of learning, the learner is tasked with the responsibility of acquiring relevant grasp of the genre in an incremental manner. Genre discourse of teaching should be applied with caution regarding their potential sensitivity to the contemporary methods of learning and teaching of writing (Ivanic, 2004). An in-depth investigation of the learning context weighing heavily on the historical records, native culture and learning environment should be conducted before the genre discourse of writing is adopted as a teaching strategy (Cope, 2000). As an outcome of these theories it can be seen that the curriculum incorporates the genre discourse of writing in learning outcome EN3-3B. The students are encouraged to discuss conventions of a range of complex texts for example act and stage directions in plays and literacy devices in poems and stories. The dominance of the genre discourse of writing in the English K-10 syllabus is linked to the view that the nature of writing stems from the need for learners to familiarise themselves with the different characteristics of individual text-types and thus be able to apply them appropriately in the relevant contexts (Ivanic, 2004). There is particular emphasis on the teaching of genres considered to be powerful genres or alternatively those that are linked to success in academic contexts. The text-types rely heavily on the use of phrases carrying relevant meanings to convey information (Ivanic, 2004), enabling leaners to benefit from this approach’s logical and systematic nature when used as a teaching method. The social practices discourse of writing outline the entrenchment of the text in the particular event of writing implying that the content is tightly linked to the social motivation of writing (Ivanic, 2004). Social attributes including participation, gender distribution and support serve a purpose in the writing as a social avenue for communication in the given context (Ivanic, 2004). Writing is considered to be an in important part of the social literacy measures, demonstrating its influence in the linguistic development and improvement of people and entire communities in general (Christie, 2005). The social practices discourse is evident in the English K-10 Curriculum across all three stages. Stage three learning outcome EN3-4B compels the learner to be able to create meaning in accordance to purpose, audience and context. An inference to the social aspect of this particular section of the syllabus points out the importance of its incorporation in the teaching methods. Theories have been developed through the study of literacy in people’s interactions as opposed to educational based research. The perception of writing as a social practice is an important theory having far reaching effects compared to the other discourses of writing. The social practices discourse outlines the possibilities of learning through means that incorporate the general interaction at socially driven writing sessions involving the achievement of personal objectives. This expands the level of learning to include aspects regarding speed, source, purposes among others supported the writing (Ivanic, 2004). The use of complex punctuation to engage the reader as outlined in Stage 3, learning outcome EN3-4B is an outcrop of the social practces discourse of writing. Learning is best achieved through interactions. The inclusion of learners in events and activities that serve to promote literacy and linguistics predisposes them to a state of taking up identities that relate them to the practices. Acquisition of writing skills is seen to be best achieved through meaningful participation, not through direct teaching (Ivanic, 2004). Outcome EN2-6B promotes the use of figurative language while composing texts to link with and ultimately engage the audience. Even though it contains elements of social practices discourse of writing, it does not do so in a manner that lowers the dominance of the discourse in the curriculum. Ivanic, (2004) stresses on the importance of the social practices discourse of writing, arguing that learners need to be in a position to relate with foreign or otherwise new contexts in their writing. In spite of the inherent benefits of this approach, its inclusion in the English K-10 syllabus is deemed unfit due to the extremely complex and impractical nature of integrating the participatory aspect of learning in a curriculum that seeks to train young children. Age is a limiting factor in the appreciation of the social make-up and as such the method should be incorporated in the syllabus for learners who have considerable social understanding and experience. The socio-political discourse in writing emphasizes on the inclusion of political as well as social factors in the learning (Clark, The Politics of Writing, 1997). In line with this view, writing draws upon socially predetermined attributes representing the expected (Ivanic, 2004). Adopting learning strategies modelled from this discourse requires thorough consideration of the political factors that influenced the discourse as well as historical effects. In line with this, writing primarily involves linking with socially developed constructs which portray the world in specific ways (Ivanic, 2004). These constructs are independently available to writers but themselves are inherently socio-politically structured in such ways as to demand the selection of one over the other depending on the context. Social groups that wield immense power naturally govern the course of the selection and limit the resources that the writer can utilise (Ivanic, 2004). The discourse has strong ties with politics, influence, society and other factors related to social norms. Stage 3 of the English K-10 syllabus under learning outcome EN3-4B discloses the socio-political discourse by asserting the learners to investigate how vocabulary choices including evaluating language can express shades of meaning, feeling and opinion. From the inherent make-up of the discourse, it is preferred learners with a socially inclined perception of literacy and an appreciable amount of concern towards politics. Constrained use of this discourse from the curriculum can be attributed to its ideological backdrop and as an extension its irrelevance in the teaching of writing following the English K-10 syllabus (Anstey, 2004). The targeted learners are in most cases not familiar with the socio-political discourse of writing as a consequence cannot productively engage in writing material carrying political themes. Such writing is best suited for audiences and writers with keen interest and understanding of political. The English K-10 syllabus hardly caters for this category of learners. Conclusion The different discourses of writing have been clearly distinguished and their relevance in the specific sections of the curriculum analysed. The skills discourse of writing is the basic approach that is considered when teaching writing. The learners acquire are able to acquire the relevant skills needed to engage in linguistically correct writing (Ivanic, 2004). Creative discourse of writing imparts the necessary knowledge to enable the learner actively compose captivating and interesting texts while at the same time maintaining the correctness of grammar. The social discourse of learning takes on a more hands-on approach with the participation of the teachers being completely ruled out as outlined by Ivanic, (2004. The socio-political discourse of writing is principally targeted at learners with considerable interest and understanding of politics. Due to the nature of the discourse, its dominance in the English K-10syllabus is overshadowed by the other discourses. Generally all six discourses play an important part in the progress and success of the learning. References Anstey, M. &. (2004). The Literacy Labyrinth (2nd ed.). Sydney: Pearson. Christie, F. (2005). Using the functional grammar to understand children"s written texts. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S(19), 9-22. Clark, R. a. (1991). Consciousness-raising about the writing process. London: Longman. Clark, R. a. (1997). The Politics of Writing. London: Routledge. Cope, B. a. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge. Dixon, J. (1967). Growth through English. London: Oxford University Press. Flower, L. a. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processe. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Gannon, S. a. (2007). Whole language and Moral Panic in Australia. International Journal of Progressive Education, 30-51. Gee, J. (2003). Literacy and social minds. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds). Sydney: Prentice Hall. Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write. Literacy Research Centre, Department of Linguistics and Modern English. Knapp, P. a. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing. UNSW, Sydney: UNSW Press. Richardson, P. (1998). Literacy, Learning and Teaching. Educational Review, 115-134. Winch, G. R. (2010). Literacy: Reading, writing and children's literature (4th ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Essay, n.d.)
English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Essay. https://studentshare.org/education/2060460-english-and-litercay-in-primary-school
(English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Essay)
English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Essay. https://studentshare.org/education/2060460-english-and-litercay-in-primary-school.
“English and Literacy in Primary School: Discourses of Writing Essay”. https://studentshare.org/education/2060460-english-and-litercay-in-primary-school.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF English and Literacy in Primary School

The Primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics

The Framework for secondary english and mathematics builds on the original Framework for english and mathematics, produced in 2001.... Exploring and analysing language)All areas of the school curriculum provide opportunities for the development of children's speaking and listening skills.... The paper "The primary Framework for Literacy and Mathematics" states that a new, electronic format allows for customised planning, teaching and assessment, with the ability to link quickly to a wide range of teaching and learning resources available through the primary National Strategy....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

Theories of literacy

literacy in one country or community may be different from the literacy in another country or community.... In terms of literacy theory, literacy theory is defined as the ability to read and write words.... There are many theories of literacy.... The research focuses on the different literacy theories.... The research includes scrutinizing the essence of the literacy theories....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

The English Language, Past, Present and Future

literacy in many forms keeps evolving and is embedded in multiple contexts including “particular relations and structures of power, values, beliefs, goals and purposes, interests, economic and political conditions, and so on” (Lankshear 1999).... The traditional perspectives differ from the functional perspectives in respect that while the former assists the encounter of literacy with the printed texts in reading and writing in the schools and keeps the journey of literacy limited to the school domain and educational context of schooling, the latter encompasses a different view which grooms literacy beyond the school domain to make it serve bigger purposes in life....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

National Literacy Strategy

)There is substantial evidence from research in this country, and from overseas, that a later start to more formal aspects of language and literacy learning will lead to quicker gains in competence in reading and writing, and actually to higher standards at age nine or 10 (1.... Children do prefer reading by themselves silently and at home, and giving them more choices in the school setting might well increase their interest level.... ven with this new system in place (updated to Early Years Foundation Stage in 2005), the debate continues, and one of the most controversial areas is literacy....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

A Survey of Language and Literacy (L&L) Programs

This paper "A Survey of Language and literacy (L&L) Programs" displays a matrix of the L & L (language and literacy)program and explores a description of each of the L&L programs.... The L and L (language and literacy) program is a type of blocks which is made up by the belief that literacy and language skills are particularly vital to each and every aspect of a life in an individual.... This is a program whose main intent is to focus indirectly or directly on economic, social, or inequalities that are political between two parties by literacy....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

Immigrants Health Literacy

"Immigrants Health literacy" paper argues that the lack of prose literacy, document literacy, and quantitative literacy among immigrants has prevented them from seeking and receiving effective healthcare provision.... There is a link between low health literacy and health outcomes.... Low health literacy levels mean that people do not have the capacity to seek or receive quality and effective health care services....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Sustaining and Maintaining Literacy Strategies in a Whole School Environment

This research proposal "Sustaining and Maintaining Literacy Strategies in a Whole school Environment" investigates the areas that have been improved so far, but its main focus would be on how to maintain and sustain the different literacy strategies in regard to a whole school environment.... The paper "Sustaining the Literacy Strategies in school Environment" is an amazing example of a research proposal on education.... literacy has for a long time been one of the most researched and highly debated issues in many parts of the world, while countries compete with each other in finding strategies to raise this bar....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Proposal

Female Education in China

The movement was not that successful to attain the parents' attention to take care of their daughters, however, the difference it made was that boys' rate increased significantly in primary and secondary schools irrespective of the fact the schools were part-time or full time.... Despite a post-World War II history of modest economic growth and significant political and cultural changes, China has an impressive record in primary healthcare.... Buck conducted an organized survey of rural areas according to which only 2 percent of the female population aged 7 years and above had ever attended school among which only 1 percent were able to read a common Chinese letter, while among males 45 percent attended school and 30 percent were able to identify commonly used letters (Buck, 1937)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us