StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Foundation of Criminal Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Journal Article Analysis of Metcalfe and Ashworth’s Arson: mens rea - recklessness whether property destroyed or damaged In Metcalfe and Ashworth’s case commentary of R v G1, a case which quashed the conviction of two minors charged with arson, contrary to s…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Foundation of Criminal Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Foundation of Criminal Law"

Download file to see previous pages

31 (issued in 1970), that defined recklessness as: " A person is reckless if, (a) knowing that there is a risk that an " event may result from his conduct or that a circumstances may " exist, he takes that risk, and (b) it is unreasonable for him to take " it, having regard to the degree and nature of the risk which he knows " to be present." With this definition, Lord Edmund-Davies explains that recklessness entails having a foresight of the outcome or its consequences, along with the “objective judgment of the reasonableness of the risk taken.

3” Thus, Metcalfe and Ashworth differentiate Lord Edmund-Davies’ discussion with that of Lord Diplock’s speech saying that it lacked the supporting statutory interpretation.4 Metcalfe and Ashworth also pointed out the considerations made by the House of Lords in the R v G case. Lord Bingham stated that the Caldwell decision misconstrued the statute, particularly Section 1(1) of the 1971 Act5 and went against the rule requiring that there be a “subjective mens rea” in case of serious crime conviction, leading to unfair results that might be “neither moral nor just.

”6 Lord Steyn on the other hand, focused on the injustice of using Caldwell decision to children, citing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.7 The commentary also discussed the meaning of “recklessness” as ascribed by the House of Lords in the R v G decision. Lord Bingham adopted the definition cited in the draft criminal code of 1989 wherein a person is said to act recklessly if “with respect to (i) a circumstance when he is aware of a risk that it exists or will exist; (ii) a result when he is aware of a risk that it will occur; and it is, in the circumstances known to him, unreasonable to take the risk.

”8 Metcalfe and Ashworth explains that from this definition, it can be deduced that “any awareness of any degree of risk satisfies the definition, and that the judgment of the unreasonableness of a risk (when that issue is contested) is for the tribunal of fact.”9 With this, they foresee that this same definition may be used uniformly throughout the criminal law, except for judges who would substitute the term “reckless” with “gross negligence” necessary in a manslaughter conviction.

10 Finally, Metcalfe and Ashworth discusses the question of legal policy as regards the liability of children, taking into consideration the differing standards applicable to children and mentally disordered people, from that of adults who are of sound mind and hence, should have been aware of the need to take care. In this case, they opined that the courts still sustain “strict liability for offences that may carry prison sentences of some length” and state that the legislature has emphasized on the objective standards especially in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, in that they introduced the “test of ‘absence of reasonable belief’ in consent to replace the previous recklessness requirement.

”11 With this discussion of Metcalfe and Ashworth, it raised more questions than answers in definitely identifying the elements to be considered in criminal liabilities involving recklessness. Their discussion was not able to persuasively argue that indeed a different standard should be applied especially those concerning children, or having a subjective approach to the circumstance of a child or person at the time the act committed, rather than seeing a circumstance from an objective point of

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Foundation of Criminal Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1454109-foundation-of-criminal-law
(Foundation of Criminal Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1454109-foundation-of-criminal-law.
“Foundation of Criminal Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1454109-foundation-of-criminal-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foundation of Criminal Law

Criminal Law Foundation

Name: University: Abstract: The 4th Amendment of the US constitution protects every individual from unreasonable search and seizure while the 5th Amendment provides that the due process of law must be fair.... The Exclusionary Rule provides that any evidence obtained by the law enforcement authorities is inadmissible before the court proceedings since it violates the 4th Amendment safeguarded rights (Hall, 2012).... However, some state courts, the US Supreme court have adopted a selective basis to determine the due process of the criminal defendant while safeguarding the protected rights....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Foundations of Criminal Law-resit journal article analysis

Foundations of criminal law: Case Commentary Analysis Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Foundations of criminal law: Case Commentary Analysis Mens Rea is a Latin word for a (guilty mind).... 1Cath Crosby, “Recklessness – the Continuing Search for a Definition” The Journal of criminal law (2008) 313 -334 Accordingly in the instant case, the judge's directions, which were based on a previous decision of the House of Lords, now departed from, were incorrect, and the conviction of the defendants would be quashed....
4 Pages (1000 words) Coursework

Criminal Law Foundations

This substantially includes children or minor individuals who are covered by the existing juvenile law under the juvenile court.... Employing the same to minor could be considered as child abuse if the law relevant to it would be placed open for interpretation.... Under the criminal justice system, this simply is a call not to violate the human rights especially by compelling a man or a child to tell something that may stand against one's will or welfare, without substantial touch of truth and appropriate legal process....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Criminal Law Foundations Evaluation

criminal law Foundations Course/Number Date Assessing the impact of globalisation on the U.... Similarly, the financial implications of globalisation on the US criminal justice system is underscored by the fact that since globalisation has made terrorism a global problem and America's interests are spread both locally and globally, the US has had to increase and fine-tune the operations of its law enforcement agencies to incorporate US' international interests....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Criminal Law: the Trial of John W. Hinckley

In the paper “criminal law: the Trial of John W.... However, Australian law takes a similar approach to English law with respect to the men's rea requirement for complicity.... G contends that the judge disastrous to leave manslaughter to the jury as a possible verdict in relation to each of the 2 men who were killed, and that this constituted a wrong decision on a question of law.... The culpability of the second participant in the event that the primary participant shot and killed or with intent to cause grievous bodily harm the victim would depend upon the scope of their common design that means joint criminal venture....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

The Philosophical Foundations of the American Criminal Justice System

One reason that prompted a change in the constitution was that the British law did not offer equal justice and was favoring the English.... The American law enforcement is no exception of what America inherited from the Great Britain.... This paper “The Philosophical Foundations of the American criminal Justice System” explores in details the history, structure, process, strengths, weaknesses, aims, and the philosophical foundation upon which The American criminal Justice System is founded....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Personal Development Plan Analysis

Modules studied include: Contract Law, Equity and the Law of Trust, European Union Law, Foundation of Criminal Law, Legal Method and Skills, Law of Tort, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Law of S accession, Law of Business Association, Land Law, Civil Litigation, Criminal… Foundation of LLB (Hons) Law program which include; Legal Skills, Law of Contract, Criminal Law, English Legal System, Public Law, Interactive Learning Skills and Communication 2, Mass Communication, Composition and Style, Principle of ked at (Huta Hegerfeld Environmental Works ltd) in the administration and human resources office as an administrator responsible for the company relationship and employment registration including visa requirements for non- Saudi employments....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Historical And Constitutional Foundation Of Civil And Criminal Law

The paper "Historical And Constitutional Foundation Of Civil And criminal law" discusses the history of the world's legal systems.... Modern law and modern legal system are distinguishable from the earlier primitive legal systems by the presence of certain structural elements.... The English common law from the 12th to 15th centuries also made advances in the legal system with better differentiation of felonies from minor offenses and later with misdemeanors....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us