StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Roe v Wade: Womans Right to Choose - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
As the paper "Roe v Wade: Woman’s Right to Choose" tells, the decision in the case Roe v Wade raises the ethical issue of whether it is morally right to allow precedence to a woman’s right to choose as opposed to the rights of the unborn fetus that is dependent upon the mother for its own life. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
Roe v Wade: Womans Right to Choose
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Roe v Wade: Womans Right to Choose"

Roe v Wade: a woman’s right to choose Roe v Wade was a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court in 1973, upholding a woman’s right to choose.The Court held that a woman has a constitutional right and the freedom to decide for herself whether or not to continue with a pregnancy in its early stages.(www.bbc.co.uk). This decision in effect, legalized abortions rather than decreeing a ban on the practice. The decision raises the ethical issue of whether it is morally right to allow precedence to a woman’s right to choose as opposed to the rights of the unborn fetus that is completely dependent upon the mother for its own life? Is it ethical to allow the taking of a life, especially in those instances where there is no pressing medical reason that mandates a termination of a pregnancy? Is abortion wrong from a moral point of view? According to the religious beliefs, especially of Catholics, life is God given and therefore a woman who chooses to terminate the life of a fetus is in effect, taking into her own hands, a decision that only God can make. Abortion is equated to murder of the fetus and the woman who engages in it held liable for the act of killing another human being. Similarly, doctors who perform abortions were also held accountable, which is part of the reason why in some states, public opinion against abortion has reduced the number of clinical outlets and medical establishments where abortion can be safely performed by qualified medical personnel (Joffe, 2003). In pointing out the importance of the Roe v Wade decision, Joffe (2003) has described how, prior to the legalization of abortion, physicians performing therapeutic abortions were placed in an untenable position because of the fierce public opposition to abortion on religious grounds. But the decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v Wade has proved to be a boon for those women who are victims of rape or illness that interferes with their ability to successfully carry a pregnancy through to term. While earlier, it was difficult for them to terminate a pregnancy due to the public opposition to abortion, the decision in Roe v Wade has made abortion legal, thereby ensuring that woman seeking abortions can now have the procedure performed by qualified medical personnel. But Roe v Wade has gone beyond merely allowing abortions to proceed when there are extenuating circumstances; it makes the decision on whether or not to have an abortion solely the woman’s prerogative. Irrespective of the woman’s reasons for choosing to have an abortion, the decision in Roe v Wade recognizes the supremacy of a woman’s right over her own body. One of the major ethical issues raised by the decision on Roe v Wade is the conflict between the unborn fetus that is unable to defend its own right to live and the right of a woman to freedom of choice on decisions concerning her own body. Jarvis (1971) points out that most of the arguments supporting the right of the fetus to life are centered upon the contention that the fetus is a human being and not merely a bunch of tissue, therefore it has the right to life, which must be respected. But Jarvis argues that this issue is irrelevant in determining the question of whether or not abortion is permissible. She argues that the ethical issue at stake in the abortion debate is actually the question of whether or not a woman has the right to make the decision for herself, in regard to her own body, even if such a decision is morally not of the highest order. One important aspect that must be considered in this context is the extent of dependence of the fetus on its mother. A woman who is pregnant has the responsibility for the child she is carrying, therefore she is morally obligated to ensure that its welfare is upheld. But can this objective be achieved by forcing her to carry to term a child she may not be emotionally and financially ready for? Forcing such an outcome could in effect be more damaging to the fetus in the long run than allowing an abortion. The Roe v Wade decision therefore rightly recognizes that such a complex decision is best made by the woman who will need to bear the consequences of the pregnancy. Recognizing her right to choose ensures that the woman herself makes decisions concerning her own body, rather than such decisions being dictated to her by persons who will not necessarily have to bear the consequences of allowing the pregnancy to proceed. Since the Roe v Wade decision legalizes abortion only during the early stages of a pregnancy, the rights of the fetus are also preserved. Paul (2006) argues that abortion is simply not a constitutional issue and therefore, the Court’s decision in this case is based upon the social and political context within which this case was decided. He offers the view that the abortion issue is not one that should be decided at the federal level, but at the State level, in order to respect the social context within particular geographical areas. But in the state of South Dakota, a recent move to ban abortion was fiercely resisted (www.bbc.co.uk), thereby indicating how strongly women in particular across the nation, support the decision that was made in Roe v Wade. In conclusion, the right to choice is an inalienable constitutional right of a woman to make decisions about her own body, even if abortion cannot be classed as a constitutional issue, as per Paul’s (1997) argument. It is the woman in question who must live with the consequences of her decision, therefore it seems only fair to allow her to make the decision, rather than imposing one on her. Applying the standard of morality to the issue of abortion makes it a very thorny issue, because it interferes strongly with the woman’s constitutional rights to privacy and freedom of choice. Different people have different moral standards and making the issue of abortion a strictly moral issue amounts to imposing a particular person or group’s moral standards on another, i.e, on pregnant women. The decision in Roe v Wade thus recognizes that the issue in question is not how moral the decision on the outcome of a pregnancy is; or indeed whether it is actually moral or not – the issue in question is whether the woman has the right to make that decision since it concerns her body, even if the decision she makes is not especially a moral one. The question to be debated is not whether the fetus is a person with life or not; pinpointing the specific stage when a fetus can be said to be human is irrelevant. It must be accepted at the outset that the fetus is imbued with life from the moment it is conceived. Rather the ethical issue that must be considered is this – since it is the mother that is the vehicle for the life of the fetus, since it is the mother that must live with the consequences of giving birth, is it morally right for other people who are not so closely associated with the pregnancy to dictate what she must do with her own body? Is it morally right for them to force her to take decisions which may not be right for her but which she will have to live with for the rest of her life? The Court in Roe v Wade has rightly recognized that it is not. References: * Jarvis, Judith, 1971. “A defense of abortion” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htm ; July 31, 2008 * Joffe, Carole, 2003. “30 years after Roe v Wade: Lessons about abortion from the San Francisco Nine”, Abortion Law, ; July 31, 2008 * Paul, Ron, 2006. “Federalizing Social Policy”, http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html ; July 31, 2008 * “Roe v Wade”, http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/abortion/legal/roewade.shtml ; July 31, 2008 5 pages 5 sources Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Roe -vs- Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Roe -vs- Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1547525-roe-vs-wade
(Roe -Vs- Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Roe -Vs- Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1547525-roe-vs-wade.
“Roe -Vs- Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1547525-roe-vs-wade.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Roe v Wade: Womans Right to Choose

Abortion and Womens Rights

Every woman must have the right to make the decision regarding abortion depending upon a number of factors like the involvement of the father, financial resources available to her, health implications as well as a matter of mere choice of whether or not she wants the baby and is willing to sacrifice her life to care for her child (Abortion Is Every Woman's Right, n.... The right to abortion is a very crucial topic that needs to be discussed and taken care of because it involves the life of an unborn child....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Roe vs. Wade Case Analysis

Wade arose because women were being deprived of the right to choose what they wish to do with their bodies.... ome proponents of the Roe case especially led by women feminists argue that a woman's right to choose abortion is a fundamental right enshrined in the constitution.... They argued that every woman should be allowed to choose what happened to her body.... Therefore, it is the prerogative of a woman to choose what to do with her body....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Assessment of the Conflicting Approaches to Reproductive Rights - Rights-Based Analysis

Reproductive rights are basically of three types: (1) the freedom to decide how many children to have, and when to have them; (2) the right to have information and means to regulate one's fertility: and (3) the right to have and exercise control over one's own body.... Wade paved the way for women's reproductive rights and freedom by establishing that the right to privacy, though it did not originate in reproductive rights cases, including a woman's right to make her own private and personal decisions about her reproductive choices....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Should the right to have an abortion remain solely with the mother

So, this paper taking legal and political perspective will discuss why the woman or mother should only have the right to abortion.... Because women not men only have the gift to bring a life into this world, after taking care of it, for close to a year.... Every pregnant woman would like to have a healthy....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Arguing that restrictive state abortion law DO NOT violate the right to privacy set in ROE v. WADE

The committee on the elimination of discrimination against women (CEDW) states that it is the duty of states parties to ‘respect, protect and fulfill women's right to health care.... The banned made women's organizations to fight for the right to access safe and legal abortion, and surprisingly international human rights law support their claims.... The denial of a pregnant woman's right to make an independent decision regarding abortion violates or poses a threat to a wide range of human rights....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Roe Versus Wade's Abortion Trial

Roe versus Wade allowed pre-viability for women to terminate their pregnancy and the state had the right to regulate only after viability.... he young lawyers Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee decided to use this denial of legal adoption to challenge the constitutional validity of this Texas law, attempting to establish a new constitutional right for women that allowed them control over their own bodies.... This case study "Roe Versus wade's Abortion Trial" analyzes a path-breaking decision to hear a case challenging the constitutional validity of the long-standing state laws that made abortion a crime, unless the abortion was performed because of a life-threatening situation for the mother....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Abortion: Laws and Ethics

Populace bicker that fetus could be referred to as organically a human being and it cannot meet the criteria of abortion as a person has a basic right to his/ her life and to live.... Those who desire to lawfully border or prohibit terminate ions explain their place as a 'right-to-life' or '-life'....
14 Pages (3500 words) Dissertation

The Impact of Roe v. Wade Decision Case on the U.S. Society

Wade case brought about mixed reactions from the public with respect to the issue of the right to choose abortion (McKay, 332; Forsythe and Presser, 163).... According to the Roe decision, most laws against abortion in the United States violated one of the most important fundamental constitutional right – a right to privacy.... While the Persian Empire stood in favor of abortion, the Greek and Romans permitted the same ('The Evolution of the right to privacy after Roe V....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us